ASP.NET 4.5 and ASP.NET Core 1 Hosting BLOG

Tutorial and Articles about ASP.NET 4.0 and the latest ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting

ASP.NET Hosting - ASPHostPortal.com : How to Migrating From ASP.NET Web API 2 to MVC 6

clock October 13, 2015 08:54 by author Kenny

How to Migrating From ASP.NET Web API 2 to MVC 6

If you create a new MVC 6 project from the default starter template, it will contain the following code in the Startup class, under ConfigureServices method:

 // Uncomment the following line to add Web API servcies which makes it easier to port Web API 2 controllers.
 // You need to add Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.WebApiCompatShim package to project.json
 // services.AddWebApiConventions();

This pretty much explains it all – the Compatibility Shim is included in an external package, Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.WebApiCompatShim and by default is switched off for new MVC projects. Once added and enabled, you can also have a look at the UseMvc method, under Configure. This is where central Web API routes can be defined:

      app.UseMvc(routes =>
        {
            routes.MapRoute(
                name: "default",
                template: "{controller}/{action}/{id?}",
                defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" });
            // Uncomment the following line to add a route for porting Web API 2 controllers.
            // routes.MapWebApiRoute("DefaultApi", "api/{controller}/{id?}");
        });

Inheriting from ApiController

Since the base class for Web API controllers was not Controller but ApiController, the shim introduces a type of the same name into MVC 6.

While it is obviously not 100% identical to the ApiController from Web API, it contains the majority of public proeprties and methods that you might have gotten used to – the Request property, the User property or a bunch of IHttpActionResult helpers.

Returning HttpResponseMessage

The shim introduces the ability to work with HttpResponseMessage in MVC 6 projects. How is this achieved? First of all, the Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client package is referenced, and that brings in the familiar types – HttpResponseMessage and HttpRequestMessage.

On top of that, an extra formatter is injected into your application – HttpResponseMessageOutputFormatter. This allows you to return HttpResponseMessage from your actions, just like you were used to doing in Web API projects!

How does it work under the hood? Remember, in Web API, returning an instance of HttpResponseMessage bypassed content negotiation and simply forwarded the instance all the way to the hosting layer, which was responsible to convert it to a response that was relevant for a given host.

In the case of MVC 6, the new formatter will grab your HttpResponseMessage and copy its headers and contents onto the Microsoft.AspNet.Http.HttpResponse which is the new abstraction for HTTP response in ASP.NET 5.

As a result such type of an action as the one shown below, is possible in MVC 6, and as a consequence it should be much simpler to migrate your Web API 2 projects.

public HttpResponseMessage Post()
{
    return new HttpResponseMessage(HttpSattusCode.NoContent);
}

Binding HttpRequestMessage

In Web API it was possible to bind HttpRequestMessage in your actions. For example this was easily doable:

    [Route("test/{id:int}")]
    public string Get(int id, HttpRequestMessage req)
    {
        return id + " " + req.RequestUri;
    }
    [Route("testA")]
    public async Task<TestItem> Post(HttpRequestMessage req)
    {
        return await req.Content.ReadAsAsync<TestItem>();
    }

The shim introduces an HttpRequestMessageModelBinder which allows the same thing to be done under MVC 6. As a result, if you relied on HttpRequestMessage binding in Web API, your code will migrate to MVC 6 fine.

How does it work? The shim will use an intermediary type, HttpRequestMessageFeature, to create an instance of HttpRequestMessage from the ASP.NET 5 HttpContext.

HttpRequestMessage extensions

Since it was very common in the Web API world to use HttpResponseMessage as an action return type, there was a need for a mechanism that allowed easy creation of its instances. This was typically achieved by using the extension methods on the HttpRequestMessage, as they would perform content negotiation for you.

HttpError

If you use/used the CreateErrorResponse method mentioned above, you will end up relying on the HttpError class which is another ghost of the Web API past rejuvenated by the compatibility shim.

HttpError was traditionally used by Web API to serve up error information to the client in a (kind of) standardized way. It contained properties such as ModelState, MessageDetail or StackTrace.

It was used by not just the CreateErrorResponse extension method but also by a bunch of IHttpActionResults – InvalidModelStateResult, ExceptionResult and BadRequestErrorMessageResult. As a result, HttpError is back to facilitate all of these types.

Best ASP.NET 4.6 Hosting Recommendation

ASPHostPortal.com provides its customers with Plesk Panel, one of the most popular and stable control panels for Windows hosting, as free. You could also see the latest .NET framework, a crazy amount of functionality as well as Large disk space, bandwidth, MSSQL databases and more. All those give people the convenience to build up a powerful site in Windows server. ASPHostPortal.com offers ASP.NET hosting starts from $1/month only. They also guarantees 30 days money back and guarantee 99.9% uptime. If you need a reliable affordable ASP.NET Hosting, ASPHostPortal.com should be your best choice.



ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting - ASPHostPortal :: Remote Validation in ASP.NET MVC

clock August 24, 2015 08:07 by author Kenny

Remote Validation in ASP.NET MVC

ASP.NET is an open-source server-side Web application framework designed for Web development to produce dynamic Web pages. It was developed by Microsoft to allow programmers to build dynamic web sites, web applications and web services. ASP.NET MVC gives you a powerful, patterns-based way to build dynamic websites that enables a clean separation of concerns and that gives you full control over markup. Remote validation is used to make server calls to validate data without posting the entire form to the server when server side validation is preferable to client side.  It's all done set up model and controller which is pretty neat. 

Using the Code

To implement remote validation in an application we have two scenarios, one is without an additional parameter and the other is with an additional parameter. First we create an example without an additional parameter. In this example we check whether a username exists or not. If the username exists then that means the input user name is not valid. We create a view model class "UserViewModel" under the Models folder and that code is:

using System.Web.Mvc;  
namespace RemoteValidation.Models   
{  
    public class UserViewModel   
    {  
        public string UserName   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
        public string Email   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
    }  
}

 

Now we create a static data source, in other words we create a static list of UserViewModel in which we could check whether a username exists or not. You can also use the database rather than a static list. The following code snippet is for StaticData.

using RemoteValidation.Models;  
using System.Collections.Generic;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.Code   
{  
    public static class StaticData   
    {  
        public static List < UserViewModel > UserList   
        {  
            get {  
                return new List < UserViewModel >   
                {  
                    new UserViewModel   
                    {  
                        UserName = "User1", Email = "[email protected]"  
                    },  
                    new UserViewModel   
                    {  
                        UserName = "User2", Email = "[email protected]"  
                    }  
                }  
            }  
        }  
    }  

 

Now we create a controller "ValidationController" in which we create an action method to check whether a user name exists or not and return a result as a JSON format. If the username exists then it returns false so that the validation is implemented on the input field. The following code snippet shows ValidationController under the Controllers folder.

using RemoteValidation.Code;  
using System.Linq;  
using System.Web.Mvc;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.Controllers   
{  
    public class ValidationController: Controller   
    {  
        [HttpGet]  
        public JsonResult IsUserNameExist(string userName)   
        {  
            bool isExist = StaticData.UserList.Where(u = > u.UserName.ToLowerInvariant().Equals(userName.ToLower())).FirstOrDefault() != null;  
            return Json(!isExist, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);  
        }  
    }  
}

 

Now we add remote validation on the UserName of the UserViewModel property as in the following code snippet.

using System.Web.Mvc;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.Models   
{  
    public class UserViewModel   
    {  
        [Remote("IsUserNameExist", "Validation", ErrorMessage = "User name already exist")]  
        public string UserName   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
        public string Email   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
    }  

 

As in the preceding code snippet, the IsUserNameExist is a method of ValidationController that is called on the blur of an input field using a GET request. Now we create UserController under the Controllers folder to render a view on the UI.

using RemoteValidation.Models;  
using System.Web.Mvc;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.Controllers   
{  
    public class UserController: Controller   
    {  
        [HttpGet]  
        public ActionResult AddUser()   
        {  
            UserViewModel model = new UserViewModel();  
            return View(model);  
        }  
    }  

Now we add jquery.validate.js and jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js to the project and create a bundle as in the following code snippet.

using System.Web.Optimization;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.App_Start   
{  
    public class BundleConfig   
    {  
        public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)   
        {  
            bundles.Add(new StyleBundle("~/Content/css").Include(  
                "~/Content/css/bootstrap.css",  
                "~/Content/css/font-awesome.css",  
                "~/Content/css/site.css"));  
 
            bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/jquery").Include(  
                "~/Scripts/jquery-{version}.js"));  
 
            bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/jqueryval").Include(  
                "~/Scripts/jquery.validate*"));  
        }  
    }  

Thereafter we add the following keys in the web.config file.

<add key="ClientValidationEnabled" value="true" />   
<add key="UnobtrusiveJavaScriptEnabled" value="true" />  
 
 

Thereafter we create a view for the AddUser action method. The following code snippet is for the AddUser view.

@model RemoteValidation.Models.UserViewModel  
 
< div class = "panel panel-primary" > < div class = "panel-heading panel-head" > Add User < /div>    
    <div class="panel-body">    
        @using (Html.BeginForm())    
        {    
            <div class="form-horizontal">    
                <div class="form-group">    
                    @Html.LabelFor(model => model.UserName, new { @class = "col-lg-2 control-label" })    
                    <div class="col-lg-9">    
                        @Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.UserName, new { @class = "form-control" })    
                        @Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.UserName)    
                    </div > < /div>    
                <div class="form-group">    
                    @Html.LabelFor(model => model.Email, new { @class = "col-lg-2 control-label" })    
                    <div class="col-lg-9">    
                        @Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Email, new { @class = "form-control" })    
                        @Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Email)    
                    </div > < /div>                    
                <div class="form-group">    
                    <div class="col-lg-9"></div > < div class = "col-lg-3" > < button class = "btn btn-success"  
                     id = "btnSubmit"  
                     type = "submit" > Submit < /button>    
                    </div >
               < /div>    
            </div >  
} < /div>    
</div >   
@section scripts   
{  
    @Scripts.Render("~/bundles/jqueryval")  

Let's run the application and put values into the user name field to execute the remote validation as in the following image.

Figure 1: Remote validation on user name


Now we move to another option, we pass an additional parameter in the remote validation. We pass both the user name and email as a parameter and check whether the username and email combination exist or not on the email input. That's why we add one more method in ValidationController as in the following code snippet for it.

[HttpGet]  
public JsonResult IsUserExist(string email, string userName)   
{  
    bool isExist = StaticData.UserList.Where(u = > u.UserName.ToLowerInvariant().Equals(userName.ToLower()) && u.Email.ToLowerInvariant().Equals(email.ToLower())).FirstOrDefault() != null;  
    return Json(!isExist, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);  

Now we call this method on the Email property of UserViewModel as in the following code snippet.

using System.Web.Mvc;  
 
namespace RemoteValidation.Models   
{  
    public class UserViewModel   
    {  
        [Remote("IsUserNameExist", "Validation", ErrorMessage = "User name already exist")]  
        public string UserName   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
        [Remote("IsUserExist", "Validation", ErrorMessage = "User already exist", AdditionalFields = "UserName")]  
        public string Email   
        {  
            get;  
            set;  
        }  
    }  
}

As in the preceding code snippet, we are passing an additional field using AdditionalFields in Remote. If we must pass more than one parameter then these will be comma-separated. Now run the application and the result will be as shown in the following image.  



ASP.NET MVC Hosting - ASPHostPortal.com :: How Displaying Validation Errors with ASP.NET MVC

clock April 2, 2015 06:21 by author Ben

Today, I write about how Displaying Validation Errors with ASP.NET MVC. We all know how crucial it is to validate user input, but it’s equally crucial how we present validation errors for the user. Take the following type:


The e mail field needs to be optional but any address entered must be valid. If a validation error happens, it ought to replace the optional label using the error message.

Behind the scenes I’m employing Data Annotations to validate the email address, so any errors is going to be passed into the ModelState. MVC has built-in help for displaying these errors (using the ValidateMessageFor helper) so it is easy to create a wrapper around that, supplying the ‘optional’ text as a parameter.

Here’s an extension method for the HtmlHelper:

public static class ExtensionMethods
{
    public static MvcHtmlString HelpMessageFor<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression, string helpText)
    {
        var validation = htmlHelper.ValidationMessageFor(expression);
        if (validation == null)
            return new MvcHtmlString("<span class='help-inline muted'>" + helpText + "</span>");
        else
            return validation;
    }
}

Here’s it’s usage:

<fieldset>
  <div class="control-group">
        @Html.LabelFor(x => x.EmailAddress, "Email", new { @class = "control-label" })
        <div class="controls">
            @Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.EmailAddress, new { @class = "input-xlarge", placeholder = "Enter an email address" })
            @Html.HelpMessageFor(x => x.EmailAddress, "Optional")
        </div>
    </div>
</fieldset>

Best ASP.NET MVC Hosting Recommendation

ASPHostPortal.com provides its customers with Plesk Panel, one of the most popular and stable control panels for Windows hosting, as free. You could also see the latest .NET framework, a crazy amount of functionality as well as Large disk space, bandwidth, MSSQL databases and more. All those give people the convenience to build up a powerful site in Windows server. ASPHostPortal.com offers ASP.NET hosting starts from $1/month only. They also guarantees 30 days money back and guarantee 99.9% uptime. If you need a reliable affordable ASP.NET Hosting, ASPHostPortal.com should be your best choice.



ASP.NET MVC Hosting - ASPHostPortal.com :: Secure Your ASP.NET MVC Apps and Utilize Active Directory

clock February 25, 2015 06:11 by author Ben

Securing your ASP.NET MVC application ought to be priority number a single each time you begin a brand new net application. Employing the attributes Authorize and ValidateAntiForgeryToken in every single controller and action will be the only method to stay away from any safety holes. In this post I’ll show you the best way to secure your ASP.NET application by implementing the AuthorizeAttribute and ValidateAntiForgeryTokenAttribute classes.

The basics

In the extremely least, you need to add an [Authorize] attribute to every controller or controller Action in case you would like several of the controller actions to be accessible by anonymous users. As an example, you probably want ALL users to possess access for the login and register actions of one's web application.

By decorating the HomeController using the Authorize attribute (notice I didn't specify any user part) the application will avert any unauthenticated user from executing any in the actions in this controller.

[Authorize]
public class HomeController : Controller
{
  //...
}

The following is an instance of decorating a controller action with all the Authorize attribute, you desire to complete this if you only want to restrict access to a few of the actions in a controller instead of all actions.

[Authorize]
public ActionResult Create()
{
  //...
}

Safeguarding against Cross-site request forgery attack (CSRF or XSRF)

The Authorize attribute delivers protection which is sufficient in most situations. Nonetheless, there's security hole with this and therefore it opens your web application for a cross-site request forgery attack. By way of example, right after a user logs into your website the website will concern your browser an authentication token inside a cookie. Every single subsequent request, the browser sends the cookie back for the site to let the web site realize that you are authorized to take what ever action you are taking, so far every thing is very good.

Right here would be the issue with only using the Authorize attribute, let’s say that a user is logged in to your website and then they visit a spam web site by clicking on a hyperlink that points to one more web site which causes a kind post back to your site… this can be negative, your browser will send the authentication cookie to your website generating it seem as when the request came out of your website and initiated by an authenticated user when it genuinely didn’t.

The above situation is known as cross-site request forgery and can be avoided by adding the ValidateAntiForgeryToken attribute offered inside the .NET framework, this attribute is employed to detect regardless of whether a server request has been tampered with.

The initial step would be to add the ValidateAntiForgeryToken attribute to every single Post Action as follows:

[HttpPost, Authorize, ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult Create()
{
  //...
}

The next step is to add the HtmlHelper strategy @Html.AntiForgeryToken() inside the type within your view.

The way the ValidateAntiForgeryToken attribute operates is by checking to view that the cookie and hidden kind field left by the Html.AntiForgeryToken() HtmlHelper essentially exists and match. If they do not exist or match, it throws an HttpAntiForgeryException shown beneath:

“A essential anti-forgery token was not supplied or was invalid”

By adding the ValidateAntiForgeryToken for your controller actions your internet site will likely be prepared to stop CSRF/XSRF attacks.

Implementing Forms Authentication using Active Directory (AD)

Often times you might run across a project where you need to authenticate users of your website using Active Directory credentials, the good news is that you can use the existing “Account” controller to achieve this, only a few modifications are necessary.

When you create a new MVC Web Application project and choose the Internet Application template, the Account controller is added to the project, you can use this controller with AD to authenticate your users. For the Account controller to work with AD we need to remove all Actions but the following:

  • Logon()
  • Logon(LogOnModel model, string returnUrl)
  • LogOff()

Your Account controller should look like the following after you remove the unnecessary Actions such as ChangePassword, Register, etc.

public ActionResult LogOn()
        {
            return View();
        }
       
        [HttpPost]
        public ActionResult LogOn(LogOnModel model, string returnUrl)
        {
            if (ModelState.IsValid)
            {
                if (Membership.ValidateUser(model.UserName, model.Password))
                {
                    FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(model.UserName, model.RememberMe);
                    if (Url.IsLocalUrl(returnUrl) && returnUrl.Length > 1 && returnUrl.StartsWith("/")
                        && !returnUrl.StartsWith("//") && !returnUrl.StartsWith("/\\"))
                    {
                        return Redirect(returnUrl);
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
                    }
                }
                else
                {
                    ModelState.AddModelError("", "The user name or password provided is incorrect");
                }
            }

            // if we got this far, something failed, redisplay form
            return View(model);
        }

        public ActionResult LogOff()
        {
            FormsAuthentication.SignOut();

            return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
        }

After this, go ahead and clean up the AccountModel as well so the only model class left is the LogOnModel:

public class LogOnModel
        {
            [Required]
            [Display(Name = "User name")]
            public string UserName { get; set; }

            [Required]
            [DataType(DataType.Password)]
            public string Password { get; set; }

            [Display(Name = "Remember me?")]
            public string RememberMe { get; set; }
        }

Lastly, add the following to the project’s web.config file:

Best ASP.NET Hosting Recommendation

ASPHostPortal.com provides its customers with Plesk Panel, one of the most popular and stable control panels for Windows hosting, as free. You could also see the latest .NET framework, a crazy amount of functionality as well as Large disk space, bandwidth, MSSQL databases and more. All those give people the convenience to build up a powerful site in Windows server. ASPHostPortal.com offers ASP.NET hosting starts from $1/month only. They also guarantees 30 days money back and guarantee 99.9% uptime. If you need a reliable affordable ASP.NET Hosting, ASPHostPortal.com should be your best choice.



ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting with ASPHostPortal.com :: ASP.NET vNext in ASP.NET MVC 6

clock June 13, 2014 09:08 by author Kenny

The vNext tag has been placed on the next version of ASP.NET MVC 6. ASP.NET vNext will be optimized for the cloud, which means applications will (or should) have only the pieces that it needs. In addition, it promises more flexible componentization and better class performance and startup times. An interesting twist is ASP.NET vNext will be an open source project as part of the .NET Foundation. In addition, the .NET compiler platform "Roslyn" is open sourced as well.

.NET vNext support true side-by-side deployment. If your app is using cloud-optimized subset of .NET vNext, you can deploy all of your dependencies including the .NET vNext (cloud optimized) by uploading bin to hosting environment. In this way you can update your app without affecting other applications on the same server. ASP.NET vNext will let you deploy your own version of the .NET Framework on an app-by-app-basis.

MVC, Web API and Web Pages have been merged into one framework, called MVC 6. This will follow common programming approach between all these three i.e. a single programming model for Web sites and services.

ASP.NET vNext includes new cloud-optimized versions of MVC, Web API, Web Pages, SignalR, and Entity Framework. The advantage of using the Cloud Optimized Framework is that you can include a copy of the Core (or Mono) CLR with your website. You no longer have to upgrade .NET on the entire machine for the sake of one website. You can even have different versions of the CLR for different websites running side by side.

.NET vNext use the Roslyn compiler to compile code dynamically. You will be able to edit a code file, refresh the browser, and see the changes without rebuilding the project.

.NET vNext is open source and cross platform. Not only is Microsoft planning for cross-platform deployment, they are also enabling cross-platform development. Batch files for the major platforms such as OS X and Linux will be provided so that you can package and deploy ASP.NET vNext projects without needing Windows and Visual Studio.

MVC 6 has no dependency on System.Web since it was quite expensive. A typical HttpContext object graph can consume 30K of memory per request and working with small JSON-style requests this is very costly. With MVC 6 it is reduced to roughly 2K. The result is a leaner framework, with faster startup time and lower memory consumption.

ASP.NET vNext apps are cloud ready by design. Services such as session state and caching will adjust their behavior depending on hosting environment either. It is cloud or a traditional hosting environment. It uses dependency injection behind the scenes to provide your app with the correct implementation for these services for cloud or a traditional hosting environment. In this way, it will easy to move your app from on-premises to the cloud, since you need not to change your code.

vNext is host agnostic. You can host your app in IIS, or self-host in a custom process. (Web API 2 and SignalR 2 already support self-hosting; ASP.NET vNext brings this same capability to MVC.)

ASP.NET vNext has new project extension project.json to list all the dependencies for the application and astartup class in place of Global.asax.

Dependency injection is built into the framework. Now, you can use your preferred IoC container to register dependencies.



ASPHostPortal.com Proudly Announces Support ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting

clock June 13, 2014 08:27 by author Ben

Web hosting provider ASPHostPortal.com (www.asphostportal.com) announced this week that it has support of ASP.NET MVC 6.0 Hosting. The ASP.NET MVC 6.0 Framework is the latest evolution of Microsoft’s ASP.NET web platform. ASP.NET MVC 6 represents a fundamental change to how Microsoft constructs and deploys web frameworks. The goal is to create a host agnostic framework that eliminates the dependencies on the legacy System.Web infrastructure.

Included in MVC 6 is Web API and Web Pages, allowing Microsoft to remove a lot of the overlap between the three frameworks. One result of this change means that MVC will be self-hosting just like Web API 2 and SignalR 2. MVC 6 has no dependency on System.Web since it was quite expensive. A typical HttpContext object graph can consume 30K of memory per request and working with small JSON-style requests this is very costly. With MVC 6 it is reduced to roughly 2K. The result is a leaner framework, with faster startup time and lower memory consumption.

“We have always up to date for the products by Microsoft offers. With the launched of ASP.NET MVC 6 hosting services, we hope that developers and our existing clients can try this new features.” said Dean Thomas, Manager at ASPHostPortal.com.

ASPHostPortal.com believes in providing top-notch service at affordable price. We offer ASP.NET MVC 6.0 hosting with the following features such as Unlimited Domain, Unlimited Subdomain, 5 GB Disk Space, 2 SQL Database and Unlimited Email Account. As a leading hosting provider, ASPHostPortal.com offers a comprehensive range of services including domain name registrations, servers, online backup solutions and dedicated web hosting. ASPHostPortal.com is well placed to deliver a high quality service.

Where to look for the best ASP.NET MVC 6.0 hosting service? How to know more about the different types of hosting services? Read more about it on ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting site.

About ASPHostPortal.com:

ASPHostPortal.com is a hosting company that best support in Windows and ASP.NET-based hosting. Services include shared hosting, reseller hosting, and sharepoint hosting, with specialty in ASP.NET, SQL Server, and architecting highly scalable solutions. As a leading small to mid-sized business web hosting provider, ASPHostPortal.com strive to offer the most technologically advanced hosting solutions available to all customers across the world. Security, reliability, and performance are at the core of hosting operations to ensure each site and/or application hosted is highly secured and performs at optimum level.



Cheap ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting

We’re a company that works differently to most. Value is what we output and help our customers achieve, not how much money we put in the bank. It’s not because we are altruistic. It’s based on an even simpler principle. "Do good things, and good things will come to you".

Success for us is something that is continually experienced, not something that is reached. For us it is all about the experience – more than the journey. Life is a continual experience. We see the Internet as being an incredible amplifier to the experience of life for all of us. It can help humanity come together to explode in knowledge exploration and discussion. It is continual enlightenment of new ideas, experiences, and passions


Author Link


 

Corporate Address (Location)

ASPHostPortal
170 W 56th Street, Suite 121
New York, NY 10019
United States

Tag cloud

Sign in